standard error
Label Poisoning is All You Need
In a backdoor attack, an adversary injects corrupted data into a model's training dataset in order to gain control over its predictions on images with a specific attacker-defined trigger. A typical corrupted training example requires altering both the image, by applying the trigger, and the label. Models trained on clean images, therefore, were considered safe from backdoor attacks. However, in some common machine learning scenarios, the training labels are provided by potentially malicious third-parties. This includes crowd-sourced annotation and knowledge distillation. We, hence, investigate a fundamental question: can we launch a successful backdoor attack by only corrupting labels?
- South America > Chile > Santiago Metropolitan Region > Santiago Province > Santiago (0.04)
- North America > United States > Washington > King County > Seattle (0.04)
- Europe > Ireland > Leinster > County Dublin > Dublin (0.04)
- (3 more...)
- Workflow (0.68)
- Research Report > New Finding (0.46)
- North America > Canada > Alberta (0.14)
- North America > Canada > Ontario (0.04)
- Asia > China > Hong Kong (0.04)
- (2 more...)
- North America > United States > North Carolina (0.04)
- Asia > China > Shanghai > Shanghai (0.04)
Checklist 1. For all authors (a)
Do the main claims made in the abstract and introduction accurately reflect the paper's If you ran experiments (e.g. for benchmarks)... (a) Did you include the code, data, and instructions needed to reproduce the main experimental results (either in the supplemental material or as a URL)? [Y es] See A.2 (b) Did you specify all the training details (e.g., data splits, hyperparameters, how they Did you report error bars (e.g., with respect to the random seed after running experiments multiple times)? Did you include the total amount of compute and the type of resources used (e.g., type Did you include any new assets either in the supplemental material or as a URL? [Y es] Did you discuss whether and how consent was obtained from people whose data you're If you used crowdsourcing or conducted research with human subjects... (a) For a detailed description and intended uses, please refer to 1. A.2 Dataset Accessibility We plan to host and maintain this dataset on HuggingFace. A.4 Dataset Examples Example question-answer pairs are provided in Tables 9 10 11, . Example Question "What does the symbol mean in Equation 1?" Answer "The symbol in Equation 1 represents "follows this distribution". "Can you provide more information about what is meant by'generative process in "The generative process refers to Eq. (2), which is a conceptual equation representing Question "How does the DeepMoD method differ from what is written in/after Eq 3?" Answer "We add noise only to Question "How to do the adaptive attack based on Eq.(16)? "By Maximizing the loss in Eq (16) using an iterative method such as PGD on the end-to-end model we attempt to maximize the loss to cause misclassification while Question "How does the proposed method handle the imputed reward?" "The proposed method uses the imputed reward in the second part of Equation 1, "Table 2 is used to provide a comparison of the computational complexity of the "Optimal number of clusters affected by the number of classes or similarity between "The authors have addressed this concern by including a new experiment in Table 4 of Question "Can you clarify the values represented in Table 1?" Answer "The values in Table 1 represent the number of evasions, which shows the attack "The experiments in table 1 do not seem to favor the proposed method much; softmax Can the authors explain why this might be the case?" Answer "The proposed method reduces to empirical risk minimization with a proper loss, and However, the authors hope that addressing concerns about the method's theoretical Question "Does the first row of Table 2 correspond to the offline method?"
- Oceania > New Zealand (0.04)
- Oceania > Australia (0.04)
- North America > United States (0.04)
- (3 more...)
- North America > United States > Minnesota > Hennepin County > Minneapolis (0.14)
- Europe > Switzerland > Zürich > Zürich (0.14)
- Europe > Ireland > Leinster > County Dublin > Dublin (0.04)
- (15 more...)
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Middlesex County > Cambridge (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- Europe > Sweden > Stockholm > Stockholm (0.04)
- Europe > Portugal > Porto > Porto (0.04)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Reinforcement Learning (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks > Deep Learning (1.00)
- Information Technology > Data Science > Data Mining (0.92)
- Europe > Switzerland > Zürich > Zürich (0.14)
- North America > United States > New York (0.04)
- North America > United States > Illinois > Champaign County > Urbana (0.04)
- (3 more...)
- Research Report > Experimental Study (1.00)
- Research Report > New Finding (0.67)